Revisiting the ‘New Ownership’ Ruse

January 11, 2008 on 8:42 pm | In Internet, Business, Kimkins Fraud, Heidi Diaz |

I don’t have any inside information on the whole ‘Kimkins under new ownership’ statement that was floated around before the legal case got traction. It just popped into my head and I wondered to myself what the ramifications would have been if Heidi Diaz had sold the Kimkins business to another real live person.

I heard a sad story once about a European investor that bought a mine site unseen from a company that had closed it up many months or years before that. The buyer understood that it was all hooked up with lighting and ventilation and other equipment. Neither party were aware that a local petty criminal had used his truck and some delinquent helpers to pull all the electrical wiring out of the mine so he could sell it as scrap copper. It wasn’t a copper mine. It wasn’t a diet site either, so I don’t know why I’m talking about it. There must be a good ’shaft’ reference in here somewhere.

1 Comment »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. Interesting! Now that you mention it, I really wonder, too!?! Where does the liability go? Could the person salvage the site somehow? Maybe Heidi Diaz could sell it to one of her multiple personalities to make another couple million bucks! :shudder:

    Comment by OhYeahBabe — January 12, 2008 #

Leave a comment

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^